![]() buy book |
ARCHITECTURES: MODERNISM AND AFTER Edited by Andrew Ballantyne. Oxford: Blackwell. 2003 It is hard to see what the eight essays in this book have in common. The tendency of the avant-garde to lapse into academic orthodoxy; the psychological roots of Alvar Aaltos creativity (and bad behaviour); the religious overtones of The Fountainhead; sustainable houses; American houses; what Georges Bataille would have said about Gordon Matta-Clarks sculpture if he had ever encountered it; a so-called RAF establishment that was handed over to the American military in 1951 without any formal agreement (either that or the lease has been lost and everybody has forgotten what it said); and the Englishness of the concept of townscape as promoted in pages of the Architectural Review in the 1950s and 60s: the subjects could hardly be more varied. Neither could the disciplinary approaches, from straightforward historical surveys, like Elizabeth Cromleys over-structured plod through 150 years of American domestic architecture, to Stephen Walkers hyper-intellectual analysis of Batailles concept of altération, written in the autistic style favoured by a certain school of architectural theory. Quality is variable too. Gerard Loughlins essay on Ayn Rands famous novel mixes literature, cinema and architecture with dreams, religion and biography in an entertaining and believable interpretation. On the other hand, Sarah Menins interpretation of Aaltos humane Modernism is far-fetched. The fact that Aaltos mother died when he was eight might explain his bullying, his drunkenness and his cowardice, but it doesnt explain his architecture. So why have these essays been bound between the same covers under that weak title, Architectures? There might be a clue in the Notes on Contributors. All are academics and four of them teach or study at the University of Newcastle upon Tyne. So this is not so much a book as an academic journal in book form. Its editor, Andrew Ballantyne, who also teaches at Newcastle, had the hardest assignment of all: to find a unifying theme. He doesnt succeed and I am not sure what his introduction is about, but its still the best read in the book. COLIN DAVIES |